耕作及轮作对土壤氮素径流流失的影响
DOI:
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点基础研究发展规划项目(G2000018605);国家杰出青年科学基金(40025106)项目资助


Soil Nitrogen Loss in Runoff and Sediment as Affected by Level Trench and Crop Rotation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    5年轮作和1年水平沟耕作试验表明:在不同的坡度上,与传统耕作法相比,水平沟减少产流7%,径流液铵态氮浓度提高19%,流失量达到13.01kg/(km2·a),比传统耕作多流失1.11kg/(km2·a);径流硝态氮浓度减少27%,比传统耕作减少7.68kg/(km2·a);径流硝态氮流失减少量和铵态氮增加量相差6倍,水平沟可减少6.57kg/(km2·a)矿质氮流失;水平沟拦截泥沙25%左右,泥沙中全氮富集率提高13%,土壤全氮流失457kg/(km2·a),平均减少18%;一季黑豆和一季黄豆及两季黑豆和一季黄豆参与的5年轮作周期,土壤侵蚀量仅为896t/(km2·a)和984t/(km2·a),不及糜子和土豆参与轮作周期的1/2.

    Abstract:

    Compared with conventional tillage, level trench might reduce 7% in average of runoff amount on different slope land, the ammonium concentration in runoff increases 19%, its loss amount reaches 13.01 kg/(km2·a), also increases by 1.11 kg/(km2·a), the nitrate concentration in runoff reduced 27%, its loss amount is 16.18 kg/(km2·a) with reduction of 7.68 kg/(km2·a), in conclusion, the soil available nitrogen loss in level trench might reduce 6.57 kg/(km2·a) than that of conventional tillage. Level trench might retain 25% of soil loss, increase 13% of total nitrogen enrichment in sediment than that of conventional tillage, accordingly, soil nitrogen loss amount reaches 457 kg/(km2·a), it also reduces 13% of nitrogen loss than that of conventional tillage. Five years' rotation experiments show the erosion modules of rotation systems with a season black soybean, a season soybean, and two seasons black soybean, a black soybean, reach 896 and 984 t/(km2·a) respectively, their modules are twice less than that of rotation system with broom millet and potato.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张兴昌.耕作及轮作对土壤氮素径流流失的影响[J].农业工程学报,2002,18(1):70-73.

Zhang Xingchang. Soil Nitrogen Loss in Runoff and Sediment as Affected by Level Trench and Crop Rotation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2002,18(1):70-73.

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2001-07-02
  • 最后修改日期:
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期:
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司