储存方式对生物质燃料玉米秸秆储存特性的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

十二五国家科技计划课题(2012BAD30B0202)


Effect of storage methods on properties of corn straw after storage
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    为了解不同储存方式对农作物秸秆理化特性变化规律的影响,该文针对整株、打捆、粉碎3种预处理方式、且分别储存在露天、覆盖、密封条件下的秸秆进行为期5个月的试验研究。结果表明,粉碎秸秆的全水分、灰分较高,分别比整株与打捆秸秆高出约3.46%、3.83%与5.95%、4.62%;但挥发分较整株、打捆秸秆分别低5.81%、4.47%;密封储存全水分、灰分较露天、覆盖储存高,挥发分较露天、覆盖储存低。秸秆储存期间,温度平均值变化不明显,极差仅在3.24~3.71℃之间,温度最高值可达50℃左右,故应保持良好的通风。发热量与全水分呈负相关变化,与整株和打捆秸秆相比,粉碎秸秆发热量下降约1 000 kJ/kg左右。秸秆长期储存时,应优先选择整株或打捆秸秆,露天和覆盖储存则需要进一步研究。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: To understand the effects of different storage conditions on physicochemical properties of crop straw, this paper has studied 3 kinds of straw pretreated methods which specifically are the whole plant, baling and crushing, together with 3 storage methods of pretreated straw i.e. stored in the open air, under the covering condition and under the sealed condition with tarpaulin for a period of 5 months. The results show that average of total moisture content of crushed stalks reaches 19.16%, which is respectively 15.71% and 15.34% higher than whole plant and baling straw. Due to the influence of environmental humidity and their own physical and chemical effects, total moisture contents of straw stored in the open air and under the sealed condition are higher than that stored under the covering condition; for the same pile of straw, total moisture content in each layer has the same change, but there are significant differences between the values. Straw temperature changes with the external environment; all are closely related to moisture content, average daily temperature does not change significantly, and the range is only between 3.24 and 3.71℃. The maximum storage temperatures are 40.8, 35.4 and 44.7℃, respectively, when whole plant stalks are stored in the open air, under the covering and sealed condition; the above data for baling straw are 32.7, 30.3 and 35.8℃, respectively; and crushed stalks are 40.5, 39.3 and 43.7℃, respectively. So, the bale of straw is easy safe storage, and when the whole plant and crushing straw are stored for a long time, it should keep the environment ventilated. The calorific value is negatively correlated with total moisture content, the calorific value based on dry basis is higher than that based on receive basis. When the group is on dry basis, the calorific values of whole plant and baling straw are similar, with the average reaching 14 000 kJ/kg, and the calorific value of crushed straw is lower, around 13 000 kJ/kg. When the group is on receive basis, the calorific value presents downward trend over time, showing more obvious decline in February and a negative correlation with the total moisture change. Taking the whole plant stalks as the example, the calorific value is reduced by 1512, 1608 and 1612 kJ/kg respectively from January to May when straw is stored in open air, under the covering and sealed condition; the average calorific value of sealed storage is the lowest, only 11 547 kJ/kg. On the whole, the total moisture and volatile of crushed straw are higher than whole plant and baling straw, and the ash content is lower than them; the total moisture and volatile of sealed storage are higher than stored in the open air and covered storage, and the ash content is lower than them. Therefore, crushed straw is not conducive to energy use, and bale of straw is easier storage than the whole plant, but its cost is higher; sealed storage is not recommended, and because the parameter indices change inconsistently when straw is stored in the open air and under the covering condition, the latter two methods require further study.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

田宜水,徐亚云,侯书林,赵立欣,姚宗路,孟海波.储存方式对生物质燃料玉米秸秆储存特性的影响[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(9):223-229. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2015.09.034

Tian Yishui, Xu Yayun, Hou Shulin, Zhao Lixin, Yao Zonglu, Meng Haibo. Effect of storage methods on properties of corn straw after storage[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2015,31(9):223-229. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2015.09.034

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2014-12-08
  • 最后修改日期:2015-04-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-04-30
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司