基于局部均值分解的触电故障信号瞬时参数提取
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51177165);国家电网公司科技项目(EPRI4108-150592)


Extraction of biological electric shock signal instantaneous amplitude and frequency based on local mean decomposition
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    针对如何快速、准确地提取生物体触电故障暂态信号中的电力参数问题,提出了一种基于局部均值分解(local mean decomposition, LMD)的生物体触电时总泄漏电流信号瞬时参数提取方法,该方法首先利用局部均值分解将生物体触电时的总泄漏电流信号分解为一组乘积函数分量之和,每个乘积函数(product function, PF)分量可以表示为一个调幅信号和一个调频信号的乘积,然后由调幅信号和调频信号分别计算得到信号的瞬时幅值和瞬时频率。与采用希尔伯特黄变换方法相比,LMD具有瞬时频率曲线波动小和瞬时幅值函数端部失真小等优点。仿真信号分析结果表明:对测试信号进行LMD和经验模态分解(empirical mode decomposition, EMD)分解分别得到3个PF分量和5个IMF(intrinsic mode function)分量,分解前后信号的能量变化值分别为0.2851、0.5633,且LMD比EMD所需分解时间短0.0743s,与Hilbert变换相比,该文方法计算的瞬时幅值和瞬时频率更为平滑,在一定程度上避免了Hilbert 变换计算过程中的负频率和端点效应现象。试验信号分析结果表明:对消噪后的总泄漏电流信号进行LMD和EMD分解,分别得到5和6个分量,分解前后信号的能量变化值各为0.5574、0.8896,所用分解时间分别为0.0835、0.2479 s;在求取瞬时频率方面,LMD方法求取的主导分量瞬时频率可判定生物体触电时刻,而经Hilbert变换求取的瞬时频率不仅无法判定生物体触电时刻,还出现了负的频率值,无法解释其物理意义;在求取瞬时幅值方面,该文方法与Hilbert变换求取的触电前总泄漏电流信号的瞬时幅值的平均值分别为11.3240、12.3728 mA,与原生物体无触电时总泄漏电流的幅值11.3538 mA的绝对误差分别为0.0298、1.0190 mA,另外,2种方法求取的生物体触电后总泄漏电流信号的瞬时幅值与原生物体触电后总泄漏电流的幅值的绝对误差分别为0.4340、0.6643 mA。因此,仿真信号和试验信号分析结果均证明所提方法是有效和可行的。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: In order to quickly and accurately extract the electrical parameters in the transient signal of the electric shock caused by organisms, an instantaneous amplitude and frequency extraction method based on local mean decomposition (LMD) for the total leakage current signal of biological electric shock was proposed. The de-noising total leakage current signal was decomposed into a linear combination of a finite set of product functions (PF) and the amplitude modulated (AM) signal, and frequency modulated (FM) signal of each PF also could be obtained. The amplitude modulated signal was utilized to calculate the instantaneous amplitude and damping, while the frequency modulated signal was used to determine the instantaneous frequency. By using the method, compared with the Hilbert-Huang Transformation (HHT), the curves of the instantaneous amplitude had less distortion in wave head and the instantaneous frequency had shorter swings. The method of HHT consisted of separation of the series data to components with different time scale (e.g. intrinsic mode function (IMF)), and empirical mode decomposition (EMD), and application of the Hilbert Transformation to obtain the instantaneous amplitude and frequency of the signal from the IMF. The results of simulation signal showed that LMD and EMD were carried out on the test signal which was three PF components and five IMF components, respectively. The energy change values of LMD and EMD before and after decomposition was 0.2851, 0.5633, and the decomposition time of LMD was shorter than the EMD. Moreover, the instantaneous amplitude frequency based on the calculation of HT and integrated algorithm of PF appear the phenomenon of flying wings, but compared with the Hilbert transform, the proposed method to calculate the result was more smooth which can restrain endpoint effect to a certain extent and extract the instantaneous amplitude and frequency better. Experimental signal analysis results showed that LMD and EMD were carried out on the de-noising total leakage current signal which received five PF components and six IMF components, respectively, and the energy change values of LMD and EMD before and after decomposition were 0.5574, 0.8896, and the use of decomposition time were 0.0835s, 0.2479s, respectively. In calculating the instantaneous frequency aspects, the moment of electric shock can be determined by the LMD, while the instantaneous frequency was calculated by using the Hilbert transform not only unable to determine the electric shock time, but also the negative frequency values appeared, which had no physical meaning. In calculating the instantaneous amplitude aspects, the average instantaneous amplitude of the total leakage current signal before the electric shock was 11.3240 mA, compared with the real amplitude, the absolute error was 0.0298 mA, while the error was obtained by using Hilbert transform was 1.0190 mA. In addition, the absolute errors between the average instantaneous amplitude of total leakage current signal after electric shock was computed by LMD and Hilbert Transform methods and real amplitude were 0.4340 mA, 0.6643 mA, respectively. Therefore, it can be seen that the simulation and experimental results prove the feasibility and effectiveness of the proposed method.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

韩晓慧,杜松怀,苏 娟,刘官耕.基于局部均值分解的触电故障信号瞬时参数提取[J].农业工程学报,2015,31(17):221-227. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2015.17.029

Han Xiaohui, Du Songhuai, Su Juan, Liu Guangeng. Extraction of biological electric shock signal instantaneous amplitude and frequency based on local mean decomposition[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2015,31(17):221-227. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2015.17.029

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2015-04-12
  • 最后修改日期:2015-07-16
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2015-09-01
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司