中国粮食主产区化肥施用时空特征及生态经济合理性分析
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金重点项目(41230751);国家自然科学基金面上项目(41871083);南京市环境科学与工程重点学科项目(2017-2019)。


Spatiotemporal variation of fertilizer utilization and its eco-economic rationality in major grain production areas of China
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    研究粮食主产区化肥施用状况能够为化肥减量增效、防治化肥损失引起的面源污染、保障国家粮食安全提供决策参考。该研究在分析中国粮食主产区化肥施用强度的时空变化特征的基础上,根据大田粮食作物对氮磷钾的养分要求,构建化肥施用生态经济合理性评价方法,并对中国粮食主产区化肥施用生态经济合理性进行评价。研究表明:从1993到2017年,中国粮食主产区化肥施用强度从205.5 kg/hm2增加到319.9 kg/hm2,其中氮、磷、钾化肥的施用强度分别从133.8、48.0、23.7 kg/hm2增加到162.6、84.2、73.2 kg/hm2;总化肥及氮、磷、钾化肥施用生态经济适宜量分别从217.4、108.7、54.4、54.4 kg/hm2增加到300.6、150.3、75.2、75.2 kg/hm2;氮肥施用强度在1993年已经超过了其生态经济适宜量,磷肥从2001年开始超过了其生态经济适宜量,钾肥在2009年后逼近其生态经济适宜量;1993-2007年间,河南、山东、江苏一直是高强度施肥省份,其它次高强度施肥的省份由高强度施肥省份逐步向周围扩散。2017年,河南为化肥施用生态经济不合理区,化肥施用明显过量;河北、江苏、安徽、山东和湖北则属于经济合理生态不合理区,化肥施用有所过量;湖南、吉林、辽宁和内蒙古施肥适当,属于施肥生态经济合理区;黑龙江、四川和江西为施肥生态合理经济不合理区,化肥施用不足。因此,中国粮食主产区化肥施用强度及生态经济合理性差异较大,总体施肥过量,部分地区存在施肥不足的情况。节肥增效、防治农业面源污染要坚持分类指导、因地减量的原则,完善配方测土施肥政策和技术手段,大力推进信息技术和有机肥利用,走有机无机肥相结合道路。

    Abstract:

    Studies on the spatial-temporal dynamic changes of fertilizer use and its eco-economic rationality in major grain production areas of China were made in order to provide some references for dealing with fertilizer's non-point pollution, reduction of fertilizers and grain production safety. Based on the data of fertilizers consumption, crops sowing areas and grain yields during 1993-2017, fertilization eco-economic appropriate amount (FEAA) model and fertilization environmental safety coefficient (FESC) model were established to form the method to assess the rationalities of fertilizer use in major grain production areas of China. The results showed that the fertilization intensities in major grain areas of China increased from 205.5 kg/hm2 in 1993 to 319.9 kg/hm2 in 2017 and the fertilization intensities of nitrogen (N) , phosphorus (P) and potassium (K) increased from 133.8, 48.0, 23.7 kg/hm2 in 1993 to 162.6, 84.2, 73.2 kg/hm2 in 2017, respectively. Proportion of N:P:K was from 1:0.4:0.17 in 1993 to 1:0.52:0.45 in 2017. FEAAs increased from 217.4 kg/hm2 in 1993 to 300.6 kg/hm2 in 2017. The fertilization intensities of N had been above the FEAA in 1993, P was above the FEAA from 2001, and K was close to its FEAA from 2009. So the higher risks of non-point pollution of N and P obviously existed. Shandong, Jiangsu and Henan Province were the highest fertilization intensity center during 1993-2017, with other sub-intensity provinces around. In 2017, Henan Provine had the highest fertilization intensity with 462 kg/hm2, while Helongjiang Province had the lowest fertilization intensity with 170 kg/hm2. Among the 13 provinces of grain production areas, 7 areas, Henan, Jiangsu, Shandong, Hubei, Hebei, Anhui and Inner Mongolia, were all individually beyond their own FEAAs with their fertilization efficiencies lower than the average in 2017, while the other 6 areas were close to or less than their FEAAs with their fertilization efficiencies higher than the average, especially Jilin and Hunan Province was with win-win development of grain production and environmental safety. In 2017, Henan belonged to eco-economic irrationality area due to overuse of fertilizers; Hebei, Jiangsu, Anhui, Shandong and Hubei Province belonged to economic rational and ecological irrational areas of fertilization; Hunan, Jilin, Liaoning and Inner Mongolia belonged to eco-economic rational areas of fertilization. Heilongjiang, Sichuan and Jiangxi Province were ecological rational and economic irrational fertilization areas because of insufficient fertilizer use. So there were great differences of fertilization intensities and rationalities in major grain production areas of China. Overall, the fertilizers were overused in China, but some areas were underused. Governments at all levels should classify the major grain production areas into different sorts of fertilization, and determine the categories of overused, rational used or insufficient used in fertilization. Guidance should be given to farmers to upgrade the grain yield and prevent fertilizer's non-point pollution, and organic fertilizers should be encouraged to use, and the construction of fertilization standards and information services should be reinforced.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

刘钦普,濮励杰.中国粮食主产区化肥施用时空特征及生态经济合理性分析[J].农业工程学报,2019,35(23):142-150. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2019.23.018

Liu Qinpu, Pu Lijie. Spatiotemporal variation of fertilizer utilization and its eco-economic rationality in major grain production areas of China[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2019,35(23):142-150. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2019.23.018

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2019-07-16
  • 最后修改日期:2019-10-06
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2019-12-16
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司