蛋白原料及其混合粉料理化性质对颗粒饲料加工质量的影响
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家重点研发计划项目(2019YFD0900200),现代农业产业技术体系北京市家禽创新团队项目(BAIC04-2020);中国农业科学院创新工程项目(CAAS-ASTIP-2020-FRI-08)


Effects of physicochemical properties of protein raw materials and their mash feed on the processing quality of pellet feed
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    该研究旨在探究豆粕、棉粕、菜粕、酒糟蛋白(Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles,DDGS)、乙醇梭菌蛋白5种蛋白原料及其混合粉料的营养指标和理化性质的差异,确定影响颗粒饲料质量和制粒能耗的关键指标,对5种蛋白原料的制粒效果进行综合评价。以豆粕为对照组,仅改变蛋白原料,采用相同的加工参数制备颗粒饲料,比较不同蛋白原料的制粒效果,进行主成分分析及偏最小二乘回归分析(Partial Least Squares Regression,PLS)。结果表明:在原料营养指标和理化特性方面,乙醇梭菌蛋白具有高蛋白含量、高蛋白溶解度、低脂肪、低纤维的特点,棉粕具有高纤维的特点,菜粕具有高纤维和低蛋白溶解度的特点,DDGS具有低蛋白和高脂肪的特点。蛋白原料吸水性强弱排列顺序为乙醇梭菌蛋白、豆粕、棉粕、菜粕、DDGS,水溶性与之相反。乙醇梭菌蛋白组和棉粕组的制粒能耗较高,豆粕组的制粒能耗最低;棉粕组和乙醇梭菌蛋白组的修正耐久性(Modified Pellet Durability Index,MPDI)较高分别为92.72%和90.57%,菜粕组的MPDI最低为79.68%;乙醇梭菌蛋白组的硬度最高为130.95 N,DDGS组的硬度最低为74.26 N;乙醇梭菌蛋白组的糊化度最高为45.56%,DDGS组的糊化度最低为31.36%。通过偏最小二乘回归模型得到,蛋白含量、蛋白溶解度和吸水性的增加会提高颗粒饲料硬度、PDI和MPDI;粗纤维含量、蛋白溶解度和吸水性的增加会增加制粒能耗。综合分析5种蛋白原料制粒特性,由高到低排序为乙醇梭菌蛋白、棉粕、豆粕、菜粕、DDGS。研究结果为实际生产颗粒饲料时蛋白原料的选择提供参考依据。

    Abstract:

    The purpose of this study is to explore the nutritional components and physicochemical properties in five types of protein raw materials and their mixed powder, including soybean meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, Distillers Dried Grains with Solubles (DDGS), and Clostridium autoethanogenum Protein (CAP). Key indicators were determined on the processing quality of pellet feed and energy consumption of granulation. A comprehensive evaluation was also performed on the granulation of protein raw materials. Five kinds of protein raw materials were mixed with ground corn at the weight ratio of 3:7 in a single-factor experimental design. The soybean meal was taken as the control group, whereas, the pelletized feed was prepared with the same processing parameters. Correlation analysis and Partial Least Squares regression (PLS) were conducted to compare the pelletizing quality of different protein raw materials. The results showed that there were significant differences in nutritional components and physicochemical properties of raw materials, where the CAP presented a high protein content and solubility while low fat and fiber, the cottonseed meal with high fiber, the rapeseed meal with high fiber and low protein solubility, as well as the DDGS with low protein and high fat. Water absorption of protein raw materials was ranked in descending order: CAP, soybean meal, cottonseed meal, rapeseed meal, and DDGS. The energy consumption of CAP group and cottonseed meal group was higher than other group, and soybean meal group was lowest; the higher Modified Pellet Durability Index (MPDI) of the cotton meal group and CAP group was 92.72% and 90.57% respectively, and the lowest MPDI of rapeseed group was 79.68%. The highest hardness of CAP group was 130.95 N, and the lowest hardness was 74.26 N in DDGS group. The highest gelatinization degree of CAP group was 45.56% and the lowest of gelatinization degree was 31.36% in DDGS group. The partial least squares regression model demonstrated that the protein content and solubility, as well as the water absorption significantly improved the hardness, PDI, and MPDI of pellet feed. The crude fiber content, protein solubility, and water absorption contributed tosaving the energy consumption of pelletizing. The granulation characteristics were ranked in the order from high to low: CAP, cottonseed meal, soybean meal, rapeseed meal, and DDGS. The findings can provide a sound reference for the selection of protein raw materials in the actual production of pellet feed.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

吴雨珊,杨洁,李军国,许传祥,李俊,牛力斌,谷旭.蛋白原料及其混合粉料理化性质对颗粒饲料加工质量的影响[J].农业工程学报,2021,37(7):301-308. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2021.07.037

Wu Yushan, Yang Jie, Li Junguo, Xu Chuanxiang, Li Jun, Niu Libing, Gu Xu. Effects of physicochemical properties of protein raw materials and their mash feed on the processing quality of pellet feed[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2021,37(7):301-308. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2021.07.037

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2020-11-25
  • 最后修改日期:2021-04-02
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2021-05-11
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司