新风过滤和排风除臭装置条件下楼房猪舍夏季环境监测
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

生猪产业技术体系北京市创新团队项目(BAIC02-2020)


Environmental monitoring of a multi-floor pig building under the condition equipped with fresh air filters and exhaust deodorization devices in summer
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    楼房猪场可节约占地面积,楼房猪舍常增设新风过滤装置和排风除臭墙用以改善舍内环境和减少废气排放。为了解此类楼房猪舍夏季环境控制情况,选择北京郊区某楼房猪舍的三个楼层作为监测对象,底层(1层)、中间层(3层)和顶层(5层)新风过滤装置洁净度分别为优、差和良,中间层和顶层风机开启6台,底层风机开启5台,通过监测猪舍的温度、湿度和二氧化碳浓度(质量分数)、风机处静压差等环境参数,分析楼房猪舍不同楼层通风量、温度、温度分布均匀度及环境舒适度。结果显示,底层、中间层和顶层风机处静压差分别为69.7、110.1和98.7 Pa;高静压差导致猪舍实际通风量和风机能效比降低,猪舍实际通风量中间层(205 313 m3/h)和顶层(233 611 m3/h)显著低于底层(247 903 m3/h)(P<0.05),风机能效比中间层(15.3 m3/(h·W))和顶层(17.4 m3/(h·W))显著低于底层(22.5 m3/(h·W))(P<0.05);底层舍内温度(24.2 ℃)显著低于中间层(24.6 ℃)和顶层(24.7 ℃)(P<0.05),舍内不同位置同期最大温差(0.4 ℃)显著低于中间层(1.1 ℃)和顶层(0.6 ℃)(P<0.05),综合温湿度和风速计算母猪等效温度指数(Equivalent Temperature Index for Sows,ETIS),底层最小,中间层最大。该研究可为楼房猪舍提高通风效率、优化楼房猪舍夏季环境控制方案提供理论依据。

    Abstract:

    Multi-floor pig building has been widely used to save the land use of farms in large-scale production in recent years. Fresh air filters and exhaust deodorization walls can be often added to reduce the odor emission for a better biosafety level. This study aims to evaluate the air quality in the environment of the barn in the multi-floor pig building equipped with a fresh air filter and exhaust deodorization wall in summer. The experiment was performed on a multi-floor pig building in the suburbs of Beijing, China. The ground (1st floor), middle (3rd floor), and top (5th floor) floors were selected as the experimental objects, each of which Unit 3 was as the experimental barns. All barns were equipped with a fresh air filter and an exhaust deodorization wall. The cleanliness levels of the fresh air filter device were clean, poorly clean, and relatively clean on the ground, middle, and top floor, respectively. A continuous measurement was made on the static pressure difference at the fan, temperature, relative humidity, and carbon dioxide concentration of the barn on different floors. At the same time, the temperature and humidity index (THI) and the maximum temperature difference were calculated to compare the temperature distribution and environmental comfort of the barn on different floors. The results showed as follows. The static pressure differences at the fan on the ground, middle and top floors were 69.7, 110.1, and 98.7 Pa, respectively. Moreover, the ventilation volumes of a single fan on the ground, middle, and top floors were 49 580, 34 219, and 38 935 m3/h, respectively. Since six fans were turned on both the middle and top floor, the real ventilation volume and fan energy efficiency ratio of the barn were significantly lower than those on the ground floor, where five fans were turned on (P<0.05). The numbers of gilts on the barn for the ground, middle, and top floor were 420, 570, and 550, respectively, while, the corresponding real ventilation rates were calculated to be 590, 360, and 425 m3/h, respectively. The environmental parameters on the ground floor, such as the temperature (24.2 ℃), and the maximum temperature difference at the same time (0.4±0.1) ℃, were significantly lower than those of other floors (P<0.05). The maximum temperature difference at the same time on the middle floor (1.1±0.4) ℃ was significantly higher than those on other floors. The maximum temperature difference at the same time on the top floor (0.6±0.2) ℃ was significantly lower than on the middle floor, however, the ambient temperature at the front and rear was significantly higher than those on other floors. The Equivalent Temperature Index for Sows (ETIS) of the ground floor (28.9) was significantly lower than those of other floors. In conclusion, the poor cleanliness of the fresh air filter device contributed to an increase in the static pressure difference at the fan, which in turn caused the real ventilation volume of the pig barn and the energy efficiency ratio of the fan to decrease. The ground floor presented the best cooling effect and thermal environment uniformity in summer, particularly with the decrease of the ventilation, where the ETIS gradually increased for the barn. The finding can also provide a theoretical basis to improve the ventilation efficiency and the breeding environment of multi-floor pig buildings in summer.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

申仲健,吴中红,张锦瑞,韩华,张颖,王华,刘继军,王美芝.新风过滤和排风除臭装置条件下楼房猪舍夏季环境监测[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(11):215-222. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2022.11.024

Shen Zhongjian, Wu Zhonghong, Zhang Jinrui, Han Hua, Zhang Ying, Wang Hua, Liu Jijun, Wang Meizhi. Environmental monitoring of a multi-floor pig building under the condition equipped with fresh air filters and exhaust deodorization devices in summer[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2022,38(11):215-222. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2022.11.024

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2022-03-20
  • 最后修改日期:2022-05-23
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2022-08-03
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司