膜下滴灌土壤水盐与玉米产量对节水控盐灌溉模式响应的模拟
作者:
作者单位:

作者简介:

通讯作者:

中图分类号:

基金项目:

国家自然科学基金项目(51639009);内蒙古自治区科技重大专项(2021)


Simulation of the responses of soil water, salt and maize yield to water-saving irrigation and salinity control regimes under mulcheddrip irrigation
Author:
Affiliation:

Fund Project:

  • 摘要
  • |
  • 图/表
  • |
  • 访问统计
  • |
  • 参考文献
  • |
  • 相似文献
  • |
  • 引证文献
  • |
  • 资源附件
  • |
  • 文章评论
    摘要:

    土壤盐渍化是干旱灌区农业可持续发展亟待解决的关键问题,膜下滴灌加适宜的节水控盐灌溉制度可有效控制根区土壤盐分,并提升作物产量。该研究以河套灌区玉米膜下滴灌田间试验为基础,应用农业水文模型(Agro-Hydrological & Chemical and Crop systems simulator, AHC)模拟分析了膜下滴灌农田土壤盐分胁迫和玉米产量对不同灌溉制度的响应,以期获得不同程度盐渍化土壤膜下滴灌玉米适宜的节水控盐灌溉制度。结果表明,土壤盐渍化、灌水下限及淋盐灌溉显著影响玉米灌溉制度和玉米耗水、产量与水分利用效率。轻度和中度盐渍化土壤玉米膜下滴灌适宜的节水-控盐-增产灌水下限分别为–25和–15 kPa,次灌水量为对应灌水下限无淋盐处理的灌水量与淋盐水量之和。轻度盐渍化土壤灌水下限为–25 kPa时,与不淋盐处理相比,淋盐处理盐分胁迫系数平均值可提高12.4%,产量可提高16.9%;中度盐渍化土壤灌水下限为–15 kPa时,与不淋盐处理相比,淋盐处理盐分胁迫系数平均值可提高31.1%,产量可提高25.2%。研究结果为河套灌区及类似干旱灌区玉米农田土壤水盐调控与灌溉管理提供科学依据。

    Abstract:

    Abstract: Soil salinization has become one of the key constraints for the sustainable development of global agriculture. Mulch-drip irrigation with a suitable irrigation regime can effectively alleviate soil salinity in crop root zones and increase crop yield. In this study, in order to understand the response of soil water and salt transport and crop growth to different drip irrigation regimes, an agro-hydrological model (Agro-Hydrological & chemical and Crop systems simulator, AHC) was calibrated and validated based on the field-observed data in 2020 and 2021 in the upper Yellow River Basin. Then, the calibrated and validated AHC model was used to simulate the soil water and salt dynamics and crop growth under different irrigation and soil salinization scenarios. The results showed that the AHC model could reasonably simulate the change tendency of the measured soil water, salt transport, and crop growth processes. The R2, Root Mean Square Error (RMSE) and Mean Relative Error (MRE) values of soil water content and salt concentration in the calibration period were 0.75-0.83, 0.02-0.06 cm3/cm3, –1.7%-14.0% and 0.55-0.83, 1.55-3.40 g/L, –15.1%-–0.3%, respectively. The above three indicators of soil water content and salt concentration in the validation period were 0.58-0.77, 0.04-0.06 cm3/cm3, –1.0%-12.3% and 0.50-0.70, 1.49-3.48 g/L, –15.0%-6.2%, respectively. Meanwhile, the R2 of LAI, dry biomass and plant height were more than 0.85, the MRE of LAI, dry biomass and plant height were in the range of –20.9%-12.8%, the RMSE of LAI, dry biomass and plant height were in the range of 0.24-0.96, 1.48-1.99 t/hm2, 11.49-38.58 cm. In addition, the scenario analysis results showed that soil salinization, matric potential, and salt-leaching irrigation all had great effects on the irrigation regime, water consumption, yield, and water use efficiency. The mulched drip irrigation with –25 kPa and –15 kPa matric potentials combined with salt-leaching was recommended for maize in slightly and moderately saline soils, respectively. For slightly saline soils, the average salt stress coefficient, maize yield, and water use efficiency of –25 kPa matric potential with salt-leaching irrigation scenario were higher than those of –25 kPa matric potential without salt-leaching scenario, respectively. For moderately saline soils, the average salt stress coefficient and maize yield of –15 kPa matric potential with salt-leaching irrigation scenario were 25.2% and 31.1% higher than those of –15 kPa matric potential without salt-leaching scenario, respectively. This study can provide scientific evidence for soil water and salt regulation and irrigation management in HID and other irrigation districts with similar conditions.

    参考文献
    相似文献
    引证文献
引用本文

张雪晨,李越,陈志君,徐旭,谭君位,黄冠华.膜下滴灌土壤水盐与玉米产量对节水控盐灌溉模式响应的模拟[J].农业工程学报,2022,38(Z):47-58. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2022. z.006

Zhang Xuechen, Li Yue, Chen Zhijun, Xu Xu, Tan Junwei, Huang Guanhua. Simulation of the responses of soil water, salt and maize yield to water-saving irrigation and salinity control regimes under mulcheddrip irrigation[J]. Transactions of the Chinese Society of Agricultural Engineering (Transactions of the CSAE),2022,38(Z):47-58. DOI:10.11975/j. issn.1002-6819.2022. z.006

复制
分享
文章指标
  • 点击次数:
  • 下载次数:
  • HTML阅读次数:
  • 引用次数:
历史
  • 收稿日期:2021-08-24
  • 最后修改日期:2022-07-10
  • 录用日期:
  • 在线发布日期: 2023-02-07
  • 出版日期:
文章二维码
您是第位访问者
ICP:京ICP备06025802号-3
农业工程学报 ® 2024 版权所有
技术支持:北京勤云科技发展有限公司